Academic phrase library · Results

Academic phrases for reporting research results

Use adaptable results phrases to report quantitative or qualitative findings clearly before explaining what they mean in a Discussion section. Match wording, statistics, tables, themes, and certainty to your verified analysis.

Report a finding

  • The results showed that [X] was associated with [Y].
  • As shown in Table [X], [group] reported a higher/lower [measure] than [comparison group].
  • Analysis of the data identified three recurring themes: [theme 1], [theme 2], and [theme 3].

Describe a pattern carefully

  • There was a statistically significant difference between [X] and [Y] (p = [value]).
  • Participants frequently described [theme], particularly when [condition].
  • The findings did not show a clear relationship between [X] and [Y].

Report the finding before explaining what it means

  1. Reopen the question. Identify the hypothesis, question, group, measure, or qualitative theme before choosing a phrase.
  2. Identify the reportable observation. Decide whether the record shows a pattern, difference, relationship, theme, quotation, null result, or mixed result; do not choose a phrase before checking analysis.
  3. State the result in plain language. Make group, measure, comparison, or theme specific enough for readers to follow.
  4. Point readers to the evidence. Refer to the applicable table, figure, theme, quotation, descriptive statistic, or output and identify the relevant pattern without narrating every value twice.
  5. Check statistical or thematic precision. Use only values, effects, confidence intervals, quotations, codes, or themes supported by your verified record; a phrase cannot supply a p value, sample size, effect size, or participant account.
  6. Preserve the Results boundary. Report relevant unexpected, null, or mixed findings, while moving causal explanation, comparison, implication, and recommendation to Discussion unless sections are explicitly combined.

Fictional learning example: separate reporting from interpretation and never fill in a statistic

This invented practice situation is not a real dataset, statistical output, or result to submit. A fictional writer checks a fictional analysis record, states a measured group difference in plain language, then points to a fictional table and a verified fictional statistic. The writer does not fill in a p value, effect size, sample size, quotation, or theme merely because a phrase has a bracket. Possible reason, comparison with prior studies, and limitation remain for a separate Discussion paragraph.

Choose a Results phrase only after you identify the evidence job

A phrase can signal a result, but it cannot turn a display, statistic, theme, or absence of a pattern into evidence. Match the phrase to the record readers need to inspect, then make the reporting choice fit your discipline and assignment.

Guide a reader to a table or figure

Use a display phrase only after the display is numbered, readable on its own, referenced in text, and helpful for seeing a pattern. Tell readers what point to notice instead of narrating every cell or label.

Report a quantitative pattern

Choose association, difference, or null-result language only when analysis supports it. Verify measure, group, direction, uncertainty, statistical values, and required format; do not turn association into causation.

Report a qualitative theme

Use a theme phrase after checking how the theme was identified and how any excerpt or illustration is attributed under your method and discipline. A theme label is not an explanation of why participants acted or felt that way.

Report a null, mixed, or unexpected result

Keep a relevant non-result visible when it answers the question or complicates an expectation. Describe what analysis did or did not show, then reserve explanations of why for a later interpretive section.

Use university and style guidance, then follow the required format

[USC Libraries' Results guidance](https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/results) describes Results as a logical, concise report of findings based on methods, without bias or interpretation. [Purdue OWL's tables and figures guidance](https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/apa_tables_and_figures.html) advises writers to mention each display in the text and guide readers to the key point rather than repeat every value. [APA Style](https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/tables-figures) explains that visual displays should help readers understand the work. [Illinois State University's statistics-reporting examples](https://about.illinoisstate.edu/jhkahn/apastats/) show discipline-specific result forms. Check the style manual, course, journal, and verified analysis before using any form.

Use a Results example

Review reporting order, fictional examples, and the boundary between reporting and interpretation.

Read Results guide

Interpret findings in Discussion

Move from reported findings to careful interpretation, comparison, limitations, and implications.

Read Discussion guide

Align the Methods path

Check that every reported finding follows from your design, data source, procedure, and analysis.

Read Methodology guide

Match certainty to evidence

Calibrate claims so they remain proportionate to method and evidence.

Read hedging guide

Connect evidence to argument

Build defensible claims without overstating what a result can show.

Read argument guide

Check citation records

Verify source records when a display, dataset, scale, quotation, or adapted material needs attribution.

Check citations

Keep source use traceable

Preserve analyses, data records, quotations, and borrowed material while drafting Results.

Read source-use guide

Choose the next step for your draft